José Alberto SCO/STJ Minister Sebastião highlighted that oral arguments in the virtual system allow for a good analysis of the topic raised by lawyers José Alberto SCO/STJ The minister opined that, in the virtual system, whose sessions last a week, there are even better conditions to evaluate the manifestation sent and com Vietnam WhatsApp Number pare it with the process at the same time. “I cannot understand this almost aversion to virtual oral arguments and the insistence on supporting them exclusively via video or in person,” he said. Minister Laurita Vaz agreed. She highlighted that the oral arguments sent through the virtual system are wonderful and, not infrequently, have generated requests for prominence from ministers. "I don't see any prejudice in the judgment in virtual sessions", she reinforced.
The return of the virtual The entry into force of Law 14,365/2022 caused an explosion in the number of oral arguments in STJ trials, even though, in cases of regulatory appeal, it is limited to five minutes — in special appeals, Habeas Corpus and appeals in HCs, the time given to the lawyer is 15 minutes. The problem affected all the court's collegiate bodies, but mainly the criminal groups, which coexist with a high distribution of HCs whose most plausible solution found is a monocratic decision, mainly because these are actions that, as a rule, require an injunction. The 6th Panel exposed the problem in September last year , during a face-to-face session with 47 requests for oral arguments. The ministers asked for awareness among lawyers, otherwise trials at the STJ would become unfeasible. The solution found by the Criminal Law collegiates was to adhere to the use of virtual trials. The 3rd Section had a frustrated experience with this practice in e 5th Class began holding virtual sessions again. The 6th Panel joined in November.